Joe

Android App MemoryUp Malware Claim is a SmearUp

Posted by Joe on January 29, 2009 | 6 comments | Filed under : Applications

This past week a damning Geek.com post started a firestorm of Malware accusals of the Android application MemoryUp by Peter Liu.

The accusal was based not on facts or substance but merely negative comments by users.

The Geek.com article points to prominent G1 user MARK – article affirms the magnanimity of the person since his username is in all caps – “Do not download. Destroyed my memory card/system delete. Then my email was spammed. TMobile can’t stop you from downloading this! So don’t!


Thus the article concludes, “As a G1 user, I’ve learned to trust the opinions of hundreds of people telling me (in comments) not to download an app if it doesn’t work. As a matter of fact, I haven’t run into a lying commentor yet.

Its the 21st century version of the Salem witch trials.

In my opinion this is what iPhone fanboys were waiting to hear and jumped on it with affirmation that Apple’s oversight and review process is necessary for keeping consumers “safe”.

Sounds like we should ditch this Democracy Republic thing and go with Communism or Fascism so we can be “safe”.

*** Wait, isn’t Google And Blog the one previously stating Cupcake would be sent as an OTA update first in mid-January and then late in the month?

Difference being it was factual information at the time but unforeseen events disrupted the timetable as well there was no slander and misguidance involved ***

I myself looked it from an ameteur Android programming standpoint finding nothing suspicious as well F-Secure who stated, “We did a bit of digging into the issue but couldn’t verify any of the claims made about MemoryUp’s maliciousness. We studied a couple of the versions that are readily available and none of them attempted to break anything on the Android platform nor did they attempt to do things other than what the application promises to do.

Google then investigated and declared their results, “We have investigated and determined that MemoryUp is not malware. In the versions we tested, MemoryUp cannot perform any of the malicious things it is reported to have done.

I myself wouldn’t use it regardless as there really isn’t much of a need for it on Android in my opinion.

So is this bad reporting from Geek.com, neophytes using Android, a way for Malware/Virus protecting software to profit off people’s fears, or iPhone fanboys causing a smear campaign on Android?

1 shackk January 29, 2009 at 1:32 pm

i don’t care for geek.com either, but wasn’t your claim about an ota update release for android also misguided?

bloggers in general should hold to a higher responsibility for their readers sake at the very least…in other words, don’t throw stones at another glass house when yours is made of the same material.

Cooper 2 Michael Martin January 29, 2009 at 1:40 pm

@shackk,
I take responsibility for posting about Cupcake and its release estimates per internal information from T-Mobile.

So my argument is that it was not intentional misguidance, although I do see your point which was why I brought that up in the post as well.

3 shackk January 29, 2009 at 1:49 pm

@michael

Thank you, it takes a lot to admit fault and / or mistakes. I only brought it up in a professional matter because I am sure there will be many who will not do so in the same fashion. My main point was to show that the blogging world as a whole can have a detrimental voice when spoken, especially when information is not factual. I really do not believe many sites think about those principles prior to speaking. Our society is quick to convict and slow to recant and this story will only be proof as I am confident all of the blogs that have trashed this application will not post a similar rebuttal. [/rant]

4 James January 29, 2009 at 2:04 pm

This isn’t surprising. I have seen reviews on the market make all kinds of claims of the application damaging the phone when the application does absolutely nothing malicious. Best example of this is Shutter Speed, an app by a google employee, that helped you tweak your actual SLR camera. When it was first released tons of reviewers claimed it made the camera on the G1 blurrier.

5 Android App MemoryUp Wrongly Maligned | Android Central February 2, 2009 at 3:03 pm

[...] [andgeeks] [...]

6 Paul February 3, 2009 at 1:22 pm

I took the same stance as you regarding MemoryUp and said either way that the application was not needed.

My biggest concern with this is that the whole story exposed a flaw in the ability for users to be exposed to malicious software without their knowledge. iPhone users have the luxury of having applications go through an approval process.

Perhaps a certification process of some sort to distinguish between known good applications and untested applications. This is something that could even roll down to users to help validate applications but could possibly lead to another MemoryUp witch hunt.

Pauls last blog post..Microsoft forgets that only ice cream shops should have lots of flavors

Leave a Reply

(required)
(will not be published) (required)
(opitional)
 

Previous post:

Next post: